Sampangan × KAI · Pathway 2
Setup cost and monthly fee per site are set directly for a 1-site program and a 20-site program, interpolated linearly in between. This shows what that looks like at scale.
Move the slider to see how committing to more sites changes the economics for every site in the program.
Compared against a single-site program — same volume assumption per site.
All lines indexed to Site 1 = 100%, so they can be compared on one chart despite different units. The dashed line is the low-throughput (worse) case; the solid gold line is the high-throughput (better) case — the shaded band is the range the throughput assumption alone introduces.
| Sites | Effective Rp/ton | Setup cost/site | Monthly fee/site | Savings vs. 1 site |
|---|
Average setup cost per site (Rp), interpolated from the Site-1 and Site-20 assumptions above. Falls from Rp450M to Rp400M by default — a smaller decline than the fee line below, since setup is one-time capex, not something a bulk-procurement discount typically moves as much as recurring service pricing.
Average monthly management fee per site (Rp/mo). This is the line that carries most of the "more sites, better economics" story — it declines by more than half by default (Rp35M → Rp18M), directly reducing KAI's recurring monthly cost per site as the program scales.
Effective cost per ton, shown as a band across the 0.45–1.0 t/day/site throughput range set above — not a single line, because the actual per-site tonnage hasn't been measured yet. The upper edge is the low-throughput (worse) case; the lower edge is the high-throughput (better) case. Valid only within this throughput range — above 1.0 t/day/site, additional machine units would be needed per site and aren't reflected here.